California Supreme And Appellate Court
Case Summaries
Civil Procedure Law
 

CIVIL PROCEDURE
Civil Procedure Law Case Summaries Table of Contents

■Bi-Coastal Payroll Serv., Inc. v. California Ins. Guarantee Ass'n, No. B205969
 

INTRODUCTION

            We issued an order to show cause regarding dismissal of the appeal as untimely, and the parties responded with letter briefs on the timeliness of the notice of appeal.  We hold that plaintiffs’ duty to file their notice of appeal arose from the service of their notice of entry of judgment, not the service of the trial court’s earlier minute order, which order did not strictly comply with the requirements of California Rules of Court, rule 8.104(a)(1), and that their appeal is therefore timely.  In the unpublished portion of this opinion, we hold that the trial court properly sustained the demurrer to the second, third and fourth causes of action because those claims are barred by Isaacson v. California Ins. Guarantee Assn. (1988) 44 Cal.3d 775 (Isaacson), but that plaintiffs should be granted leave to amend to plead a cause of action for reimbursement as recognized in Isaacson. 

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

            On July 7, 2005, plaintiffs and appellants (plaintiffs)[1] filed a complaint against defendant and respondent California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) for declaratory relief.  A month later, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint, again seeking only declaratory relief.  In response, CIGA filed a motion to strike and a demurrer.  The trial court granted the motion to strike, but overruled the demurrer.  After CIGA answered, plaintiffs sought and obtained leave of court to amend their complaint.  In addition to declaratory relief, the second amended complaint asserted causes of action for an accounting, negligence, and breach of fiduciary duty.  CIGA responded with a motion to strike and a demurrer to the accounting, negligence, and breach of fiduciary duty causes of action.  The trial court sustained the demurrer without leave to amend, leaving only the declaratory relief cause of action.

            As discussed in detail below, plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the declaratory relief cause of action and the parties stipulated to entry of judgment in favor of CIGA.  In a minute order served on the parties, the trial court accepted the stipulation and entered judgment.  Plaintiffs thereafter gave formal notice of entry of judgment and filed a notice of appeal.

■ HELD:
Bi-Coastal Payroll Serv., Inc. v. California Ins. Guarantee Ass'n, No. B205969
Trial court judgment is reversed and remanded where plaintiffs' duty to file their notice of appeal arose from the service of their notice of entry of judgment and was therefore timely filed, as the service of the trial court's earlier minute order did not strictly comply with the requirements of California Rules of Court 8.104(a)(1), and thus did not commence the duty to the file a notice of appeal.
Bi-Coastal Payroll Serv. v. CA Ins. Guarantee Assn.  -B205969- 5/29/09 CA2/5
Bi-Coastal Payroll Serv. v. CA Ins. Guarantee Assn.  -B205969- 5/29/09 CA2/5-PDF

CIVIL PROCEDURE, ENTERTAINMENT LAW, GOVERNMENT LAW, INSURANCE LAW, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW

Bi-Coastal_Payroll_Serv_v_CA_Ins_Guarantee_B205969_California_Rules_Court_8.104

California Supreme And Appellate Court Opinions Directory       
Case Summaries Directory
Civil Procedure Law Case Summaries Table of Contents