Home

|  |  Table of Contents

|         Court Forms  | Law Journals  |  Law Students | Law Dictionary  | News

     

CalCaseLaw.Com

  BankruptcyCode.US
     

  California

  United States Law.US
     

Case Summaries-Evidence

  US Government
     

Table of Contents

  US Tax Center
 US Codes | State Codes Federal Civil Procedure

| FederalCriminalProcedure

| California Appeals

| Lawyers
                                                 


A Legal and Business Portal

 

 

   
   
Social Security |  Finance   Hotels

US History

Restaurants

 Entertainment

World Directory

     

 

 

 


Free Legal Education **
US Business Directory | New York News
Health and Fitness Guide
California Superior Courts 
California Courts-Local Court Rules
My eLawOffice
University Law School     
California Criminal law
California Jury Instructions   
California Case Law 
California Appeals 
California Writs  
Legal News
First Amendment
Fourth Amendment
Fifth Amendment
Sixth Amendment

 


California Supreme And Appellate Court
Case Summaries
Evidence
 



California Supreme And Appellate Court Opinions Directory 
Search Cal Case Law Web Site Tip 
Detail case information indicator Indicates detailed case information may be available online by clicking icon.

Case Summaries

 

       

Law Students

 

California Supreme And Appellate Court
Case Summaries
Evidence
 

EVIDENCE LAW

A jury convicted Germemias Aguilera Torres of misdemeanor driving while under the influence of a drug (methamphetamine).(Veh. Code, § 23152, subd. (a).)  The trial court sentenced Torres to 120 days in jail.

Torres appeals, arguing there is insufficient evidence to establish his use of methamphetamine appreciably impaired his ability to drive safely.  Alternatively, Torres argues the trial court prejudicially erred by failing to give a unanimity instruction sua sponte.  In addition, Torres argues the trial court prejudicially erred by allowing the prosecutor to question an expert witness about an article on methamphetamine use and driving impairment.  To the extent defense counsel may have failed to preserve the latter issue for appeal, Torres argues defense counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel. 

Conviction for driving while under the influence of a drug is reversed where there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction and prove that defendant's methamphetamine use actually impaired his driving ability on the night of his arrest.

People  v. Torres -D052887- 5/5/09 CA4/1 Detailed case information
People  v. Torres -D052887- 5/5/09 CA4/1 -pdf

 

spacer bar


California Supreme And Appellate Court Opinions Directory 

 

     

 
  

   

 

 


 

       
 Law Students

  

  



California Supreme And Appellate Court Opinions Directory   
Intellectual Property Law Case Summaries Maatuuk v. Guttman , No. B200675



Thomas - Legislative Information on the Internet |Check Your Credit Score | UN Treaty Reference Guide
Directory of Medical Dictionaries |
California Injury (Torts) Law | Yaazoo! | Shopping
USA Entertainment.US | FederalCriminalProcedure.Com | United Statea News |
Travel |
FederalCriminalProcedure.Com | iLaw Dictionary.Com |
Library of Congress | War on Terror
United States Law Consumer Law  | USA Entertainment.US |
starUnited States News | California Evidence
iBusiness Center.US | United States Law: Constitutional Law: Constitutions of  The World

California Contracts Law.Com | California Injury (Torts) Law | Advanced Trial Handbook
Phone Directories From Around the World New | California Law Revision Commission | Federal Courts
California Civil Procedure.Com | Advanced Trial Handbook-Ervin A. Gonzalez, Esq. | Asset Protection Book.com
Yaazoo! | Abogados Latinos | United States History | Spanish | Federal Courts | Federal Rules of Evidence


Copyright 2003 by  © - CalCaseLaw.Com™©  All Rights Reserved